Skip to main content
  1. Articles/

Beyond Checklists: What Quality in Internal Audit Really Means

·2 mins
Author
JT Erwin
I think about how to make audit analytics credible, scalable, and actually useful. I write about what I’m learning.

What does quality mean in Internal Audit?  Quality in Internal Audit means effective actionable communication to organizational leadership through issues, recommendations, opinions, and insights.

In order for internal audit to deliver quality communications, it must focus on Risk Orientation, Stakeholder Relationships, Resource Optimization, and Operational Excellence.  The components of quality information in communications include information that is objective, relevant, timely, complete, acurate, and useful.  For Internal Audit, this means our communications originate from a Risk Orientation.  Through risk assessments, Internal Audit sets a risk-based audit plan that is tied to the current, dynamic view of the enterprise’s risks and objectives.  This means Internal Audit is communicating to stakeholders about relevant risks that can be acted upon while building it’s standing as a trusted advisor.     

Internal Audit can only be effective in delivering quality communications if it has curated Stakeholder Relationships within the enterprise.  Without knowing what stakeholders are trying to accomplish, and the information needed to do so, Internal Audit will be ineffective at including relevant or useful information in communications.  Internal Audit can build these relationships through regular contact with stakeholders outside of the audit context.  As these relationships grow, Internal Audit can continue to position itself as a trusted advisor and build stakeholder support for the issues, recommendations, opinions, and insights they generate.     

Another component of delivering quality communications is Resource Optimization.  Every assignment in the audit plan is a choice that should be concidered carefully.  When we succeed in allocating resources, SMEs on high-velocity risks produce clearer root-cause narratives and tighter recommendations, fieldwork aligned to decision windows reduce report cycle times and put insights in front of accountable leaders when choices are still open, and analytics increases coverage and confidence levels allowing sharper, evidence-backed conclusions.  When we staff to risk, sequence to the decision, and equip teams with analytics and automation, our reports land sooner, read clearer, and stand on stronger evidence.   

Internal Audit’s focus on Operational Excellence through adequate review and supervision, effective policies and methodology, and assurance coordination with second-line functions allows us to generate insights that have been generated in a consistent, quality manner.

Audit quality isn’t perfection but it is the ability to produce decision-useful, timely, and credible assurance and insights at a pace that matches risk velocity.  We are auditing the organization’s most consequential risks, in time to inform key decisions, with the expertise those risks require, and we deliver clear, evidence‑backed messages to accountable decision‑makers.  Could every staff auditor through CAE answer this question tomorrow?

Share this article